[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scheme night-mare...
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: scheme night-mare... |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:18:10 -0700 |
> Hi, the mentioned routine is called ~ 230000 times and does hardly consume
> time according to gprof.
> it is a cello and piano score with quite lot systems squeezed onto the a3
> pages. it contains ~ 1600 bars, and breaks.size() is around 1200 IIRC
Does the attached patch help? For me, it reduces dramatically the
number of times that combine_pure_heights (and also ly_scm2interval)
is called, but it has very little effect on lilypond's overall running
time (for the optimized build, at least).
Cheers,
Joe
0001-Optimizations.patch
Description: Text Data
- Re: scheme night-mare..., (continued)
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Boris Shingarov, 2010/07/11
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/07/11
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Neil Puttock, 2010/07/11
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Arno Waschk, 2010/07/11
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Boris Shingarov, 2010/07/11
Re: scheme night-mare..., Arno Waschk, 2010/07/12
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Carl Sorensen, 2010/07/12
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Arno Waschk, 2010/07/12
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Joe Neeman, 2010/07/12
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Arno Waschk, 2010/07/12
- Re: scheme night-mare...,
Joe Neeman <=
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Neil Puttock, 2010/07/13
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Joe Neeman, 2010/07/13
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Arno Waschk, 2010/07/14
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Arno Waschk, 2010/07/14
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Joe Neeman, 2010/07/14
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Arno Waschk, 2010/07/14
- Let's speed up lilypond! was: scheme night-mare..., Arno Waschk, 2010/07/14
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Joe Neeman, 2010/07/14
- Re: scheme night-mare..., Arno Waschk, 2010/07/18
Re: scheme night-mare..., Arno Waschk, 2010/07/12