[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push? |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:04:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Mark Polesky <address@hidden> writes:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> Could either of you shove this into the doc-work chapter
>> of the Contributor's Guide? Possibly making a new section
>> for "Doc policy rationale", or else just wherever the
>> @code{} bit is discussed.
>
> Okay to push?
Uh, I am missing the rationale. Namely a sentence to the effect
"wrapping metavariable declarations additionally in @code{@@code} is
necessary so that they are formatted in all backends in a way
identically to the way they actually appear in longer code passages".
That was what you answered in your posting. While a rationale is
strictly not necessary in a bunch of instructions, it will do wonders
for morale and acceptance.
--
David Kastrup
Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?, Graham Percival, 2010/09/21
- Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?, Mark Polesky, 2010/09/24
- Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?, Mark Polesky, 2010/09/24
- Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?, David Kastrup, 2010/09/25
- Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?, Mark Polesky, 2010/09/25
- Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?, David Kastrup, 2010/09/25
- Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?, Carl Sorensen, 2010/09/25
Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?, Mark Polesky, 2010/09/25