Re: accordion glyph changes

[David Kastrup]

Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:24 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Is this a good change?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> - Graham
>>> From f021b1f3fa3a696a132dcdd6e27005c95e27176f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>
>> Should think so.  How did I overlook that?
>
> Judging from the version strings, nobody's run convert-ly on the docs
> since 2.12.0.  :(   there's a bunch of cruft to fix, but you're far
> from the only person to overlook stuff.  :(

Ah, I think I remember that somebody told me that the important thing
was the convert-ly rule, and that the automatic procedures would take
care of the rest.

-- 
David Kastrup