lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Remove arabic.ly from common note name languages. (issue2755041)


From: percival . music . ca
Subject: Re: Remove arabic.ly from common note name languages. (issue2755041)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:03:10 +0000

comments.


http://codereview.appspot.com/2755041/diff/22001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (left):

http://codereview.appspot.com/2755041/diff/22001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#oldcode447
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:447: use default (Nederlands) note
names, the @address@hidden
Incidently, does your language change mean that this limitation is no
longer true?  That would be awesome.

http://codereview.appspot.com/2755041/diff/22001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/2755041/diff/22001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode41
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:41: * Non-Western notations and
tunings::
WTM is "notations" ?

http://codereview.appspot.com/2755041/diff/22001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode444
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:444: @address@hidden@bs{}include
"english.ly"}} to the input file.
If you're going to change this, then you might as well change it
properly.
-------
For example, to use English note names, use:

@lilypond[quote,verbatim]
\language "english"
\relative c'' {
  c4 cs cf css
}
@end lilypond
-----

I thought you were only doing the arabic stuff here, but oh well.

http://codereview.appspot.com/2755041/diff/22001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode570
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:570: @unnumberedsubsubsec
Non-Western notations and tunings
Why have an @unnumberedsubsubsec  here at all?  I suggest a single
sentence in the previous bit, saying something like "Some types of
non-Western music use alternate pitches; these are discussed in
@ref{World music}."

Then we can safely isolate all that stuff to the relevant Specialist 2.x
section.  Your job as a programmer and doc writer is over -- as long as
it's clear where this weird stuff should be discussed, you're fine.  Let
somebody who cares about the alternate notations write the descriptions.

You're not expected to care about everything that your work touches.
And even if you *do* care about it, I'd rather see any music theory
descriptions as a separate patch, anyway.  Focus on the _specific_ topic
at hand and get the patch approved+pushed.  There's always time for more
patches later on.

http://codereview.appspot.com/2755041/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]