[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043)
From: |
Ian Hulin |
Subject: |
Re: Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043) |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:17:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6 |
On 29/10/10 05:12, address@hidden wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/2642043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely
>
> File Documentation/notation/spacing.itely (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/2642043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely#newcode1509
>
> Documentation/notation/spacing.itely:1509: available. Then, the
> staff-like contexts are distributed between
> This seems to say that staff-like contexts cannot influence the spacing
> of staffs. Line 1711 about non-affinity-spacing, though, implies that
> staff-like contexts can influence the spacing to both their neighbors,
> pushing them apart if need be. (I do not yet understand the behavior
> well enough to suggest better text.)
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/2642043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely#newcode1513
>
> Documentation/notation/spacing.itely:1513: * Inter-system spacing
> properties::
> Within-system
You said: inter = between, intra = within ==> Between-system,
or do you mean the original "Inter-system spacing" should have read
"Intra-system spacing"?
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/2642043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely#newcode1520
>
> Documentation/notation/spacing.itely:1520: @node Inter-system spacing
> properties
> Within-system
>
See the comment above.
> http://codereview.appspot.com/2642043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely#newcode1624
>
> Documentation/notation/spacing.itely:1624: size) will always reset all
> its default key-values.
> On 2010/10/27 08:44:41, Mark Polesky wrote:
>> Can anyone think of a good place for this?
> End of section 5.3.1 Overview of modifying properties
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/2642043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely#newcode1662
>
> Documentation/notation/spacing.itely:1662:
> @code{after-last-staff-spacing}).
> On 2010/10/27 08:44:41, Mark Polesky wrote:
>> What's a better way to word it?
> "... leave this property unset, because if set it will be used instead
> of any StaffGrouper property that would have otherwise applied."
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/2642043/
- Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043), markpolesky, 2010/10/22
- Re: Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/10/22
- Re: Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043), markpolesky, 2010/10/23
- Re: Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/10/23
- Re: Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043), tdanielsmusic, 2010/10/23
- Re: Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043), joeneeman, 2010/10/26
- Re: Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043), markpolesky, 2010/10/27
- Re: Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043), k-ohara5a5a, 2010/10/29
- Re: Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043),
Ian Hulin <=
- Re: Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043), joeneeman, 2010/10/29
- Re: Doc: NR 4.4.1: Rewrite. (issue2642043), k-ohara5a5a, 2010/10/29