[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.13.40 regtests
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: 2.13.40 regtests |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Nov 2010 22:09:00 +0000 |
On 25 November 2010 17:45, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> It wouldn't take me long to write a C# program (less than a day, I'd guess)
> that reproduced quite a lot of the regtest checker functionality and did a
> pixel-by-pixel check for image changes. I've done the latter bit in about
> 20 minutes on the figured bass png that started this discussion.
That looks interesting, though I assume you wouldn't be doing
pixel-by-pixel checks on every pair of images (far too costly in terms
of computational load and time taken).
Cheers,
Neil
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/21
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Neil Puttock, 2010/11/23
- Message not available
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Neil Puttock, 2010/11/24
- Message not available
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests,
Neil Puttock <=
- Message not available
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/25
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Neil Puttock, 2010/11/25
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/25
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/26
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/27
- Message not available
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/27
- Message not available
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/11/26