[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.13.41 and near future

From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Subject: Re: 2.13.41 and near future
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:28:24 +0100

reverting is OK since the patch is wrong ad Valentin asks for it, right?

Let me think about that.  What I would like is for Valentin
to fix it the way he thinks it's best.  Eg: two patches, one simple
git revert --no-edit and the new patch.  I don't like reverting other
people's patches.

Graham Percival schreef op di 07-12-2010 om 12:09 [+0000]:
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Valentin Villenave
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Here's a new patch that you can use instead of the previous one.
> > (Since you've reverted it.) Please let me know how that works!
> Jan, where are we on this?
> - do you want to officially git revert Valentin's previous patch, then
> apply this one instead?
> - do you want to ask Valentin to create a patch from current git head?
> I'd like to make another unstable release in the next day or two (when
> 1427 is fixed), so it would be nice if this could be sorted out.  I
> don't know what the original patch was doing, so I'm not eager to jump
> in and examine the new one.
> Cheers,
> - Graham

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond
Freelance IT | AvatarĀ®  

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]