Re: accidental.ly regtest

[Phil Holmes]

"David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote in message 
news:address@hidden
> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

> > Well - because it's unusual.  Far more common to have a sharp on a
> > natural note in the key sig, or a natural on a flat, for example.
>
> And a regtest should not test unusual things?
>
> I still fail to see why.

It's not actually testing the use of a natural-sharp in a flats key sig. 
It's testing the display of accidentals on the subsequent notes.  My reason 
for suggesting changing it is that, if you've limited exposure to all forms 
of music, and you're looking at this test to see if it's working properly, 
then you may concentrate on the unusual aspect of the flat-to-sharp change, 
and miss an error elsewhere.

--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad