[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Doc: NR cross-staff (issue3782042)

From: Carl Sorensen
Subject: Re: Doc: NR cross-staff (issue3782042)
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 22:03:08 -0700

On 12/24/10 9:37 PM, "Keith OHara" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:54:38 -0800, <address@hidden> wrote:
>> [...]I would prefer to see the original example retained to show in the
>> starkest
>> fashion how staves should be changed manually, with this one added later
>> to show the possibility of collisions.
> That's a better way to do it.  The attached patch reverts the original
> example, and is a simple addition of one @lilypond and one paragraph.
> Carl started this issue for me, and I think it best to stay on his issue
> number for continuity. Carl will probably upload the patch to his issue for
> me, but we can't expect that to happen too soon.
> No need to wait for the upload, though, because this simple patch is
> human-readable.
> The new example involves the types of collisions that I see most often.  Tell
> me if the resolutions of the ugly collisions, the pitched rests and commented
> use of staff-padding, needs any extra description in the text.

Actually, we don't track Reitveld issue numbers.  The only issue numbers we
track are LilyPond issue numbers.

And it's best to have the patch from your git, because it has all your
information as the author.

You've put it on the email, so Trevor can push it.



> -Keith 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]