Re: lilypond too noisy on the cmd line

[David Santamauro]

On Jan 2, 2011, at 9:47, "Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)" <address@hidden> wrote:

> You should consider using a proper logging framework with different
> logging levels.
> 
That is a really good idea. There are a few gotchas that need addressing, for 
example the use of ly:message to emit warnings and such, but I'll take a look 
at a broader solution.

David






> 
> On 1/2/11, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 02:25:57AM -0500, David Santamauro wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 10:19:18 +0000
>>> Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1074
>>>> Patches appreciated.  Unfortunately I doubt that anything will
>>>> happen unless you personally work on it, but it's "on the books".
>>> 
>>> Question: Should the be_verbose_global variable control this? I'm not
>>> sure a new command line argument is really needed as long as it is
>>> agreed upon what verbose is and isn't.
>> 
>>> I added a be_quiet_global in my sandbox but reading the thread makes me
>>> think that simplification is needed and not an expansion.
>> 
>> Since we already have a be_verbose_global variable, I can't
>> imagine much serious objection to having a be_quiet_global.  My
>> initial guess would be that we want three different types of
>> output:
>> - verbose
>> - normal
>> - quiet
>> 
>> However, this is definitely outside my depth.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> - Graham
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>>