[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Potential fix for issue 37
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Potential fix for issue 37 |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:15:51 +0100 (CET) |
>> I'm not sure whether using the `natural' angle is really that good
>> $(Q#|(B we are entering quite complicated formatting issues... Perhaps
>> applying a damping factor to make the beams less steep?
>
> I think the usual beam slope calculation (which involves dampening)
> should be more or less fine. That's what I meant with "natural
> angle".
Well, I mean even more damped... But this is just a gut feeling not
founded by real-world examples.
Werner
- Potential fix for issue 37, mike, 2011/01/07
- Potential fix for issue 37, Mike Solomon, 2011/01/07
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/07
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Andrew Hawryluk, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Mike Solomon, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, David Kastrup, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Carl Sorensen, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/08
Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Neil Puttock, 2011/01/07
Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Jan WarchoĊ, 2011/01/07