[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:41:45 +0000 |
On 3/8/11, Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> wrote:
> i don't see any discussion going on here, so i assume you agree to
> shortening the 32nd unbeamed stem.
> I attach the patch.
IMO, there are two steps to this type of change:
1. discuss the aesthetics (or "beautiful notation"). That discussion
seems to be over.
2. discuss the technical patch. That discussion may or may not be
over, but I haven't seen it "officially" start.
Could you upload this patch to rietveld? Once that's done, if the
patch passes the "obvious" checks, I'll include it in a 48-hour patch
countdown.
Sorry for the extra caution, but I'm not going to push changes to the
fonts on my own authority. I want to give plenty of time for people
familiar with the topic to object, once it's clear that we have a
precise patch on the table rather than a general discussion..
Cheers,
- Graham
- shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Janek Warchoł, 2011/03/04
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Carl Sorensen, 2011/03/04
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2011/03/04
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/03/04
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Trevor Daniels, 2011/03/05
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Janek Warchoł, 2011/03/05
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Janek Warchoł, 2011/03/08
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Trevor Daniels, 2011/03/08
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, Janek Warchoł, 2011/03/09
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, address@hidden, 2011/03/09
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length, address@hidden, 2011/03/09