lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Potential fix for issue 1504. (issue4237057)


From: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Potential fix for issue 1504. (issue4237057)
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:10:34 -0400

On Mar 16, 2011, at 6:06 AM, address@hidden wrote:

> Done - after an LGTM from Han Wen, I'll run the regtests and push l8r
> today unless anyone has more comments.
> 
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/13002/lily/beam.cc
> File lily/beam.cc (right):
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/13002/lily/beam.cc#newcode593
> lily/beam.cc:593: Interval placements = robust_scm2interval
> (me->get_property ("normalized-endpoints"), Interval (0.0,0.0));
> On 2011/03/16 02:17:28, hanwenn wrote:
>> space after ,
> 
> Done.
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/13002/lily/beam.cc#newcode624
> lily/beam.cc:624: weights[RIGHT] = 1 - multiplier;
> On 2011/03/16 02:17:28, hanwenn wrote:
>> weights.swap() ?
> 
> Done.
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/13002/lily/beam.cc#newcode636
> lily/beam.cc:636: + beam_dy * segments[extreme].vertical_count_;
> On 2011/03/16 02:17:28, hanwenn wrote:
> 
>> how about
> 
>> int idx = {i, extreme}
>> int translations[2]
>> for (j = 0;j<2;j++)
>>   translations[i] = slope * (segments[idx[j]]  .. etc)
> 
> Done.
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/13002/lily/spanner.cc
> File lily/spanner.cc (right):
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/13002/lily/spanner.cc#newcode406
> lily/spanner.cc:406: SCM ret = scm_cons (scm_from_double (0.0),
> scm_from_double (0.0));
> On 2011/03/16 02:17:28, hanwenn wrote:
>> i personally like 'result' better, almost as short, and a full word.
> 
>> You could init to SCM_EOL instead?
> 
> Done.
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/13002/lily/spanner.cc#newcode433
> lily/spanner.cc:433: SCM t = ly_interval2scm (Interval
> (unnormalized_endpoints[i][LEFT] / total_width,
> unnormalized_endpoints[i][RIGHT] / total_width));
> On 2011/03/16 02:17:28, hanwenn wrote:
>> try using interval * 1/width (or 1/width * interval).  The operator
> overloading
>> for interval is hit and miss.  You can add a operator/ if you want
> (separate
>> commit)
> 
> Done.
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/
> 

Pushed, w/ whitespace errors squelched & the version number in the regtest 
updated to 2.13.55.

Cheers,
MS




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]