[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another fix candidate for issue 1613. (issue4426072)

From: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Another fix candidate for issue 1613. (issue4426072)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 07:56:56 -0700

On May 1, 2011, at 10:47 AM, address@hidden wrote:

> Ran the regtests - had to make one change, but they are now squeaky
> clean.  Confirmations would be appreciated!
> Cheers,
> Mike

After chatting a bit w/ Han-Wen, I'm pushing this for now.  In the future, he 
may implement a class to take care of this.  For now, my solution works and 
does not break any regtests.  I have some ideas for how to optimize one of the 
loops (at the expense of slightly more memory used), but I want to get this 
version up and running to see if it is as functional as I think it is. can be modified via the addition of an 
accidental to check for this behavior.  Let me know if you want me to do this.

Pushed as e0679ba2d5af0f480a67e6108760ef3ee9bcdb80


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]