[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mon, 23 May 2011 20:13:49 +0100
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 04:43:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> > As far as I know, we have master as the current development snapshot.
> > We have stable/2.14 as the 2.14 candidate; patches are cherry-picked from
> > master to stable/2.14.
Yes. Expect a release tomorrow.
> > I don't think anything is officially happening with release/unstable and
> > release/2.14
release/unstable is not used at the moment. I have no clue what
release/2.14 is, but I'll look into it. I probably just pushed a
branch like that instead of stable/2.14. Or maybe we should
rename release/2.14 to stable/2.14
> Well, perhaps I have been confused by the amount of stuff cherry-picked
> into stable/2.14 (the source of the cherry-picks gets lost in the branch
> graph), combined with a slowdown of development in master. That makes
> it appear like a lot more is happening in stable/2.14 when in fact it is
> merely catching up with previous developments in master.
This is understandable. You are quite correct in the final
thought that stable/2.14 is merely catching up to (selected
portions of) master.
Re: Branches?, Graham Percival, 2011/05/25