[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
GOP-PROP 0: meta-discussion about the discussions
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
GOP-PROP 0: meta-discussion about the discussions |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:00:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
The below is copied from
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/
There are a number of policy decisions -- some of them fairly
important -- which we have been postponing for a few years. Now
that 2.14 is out, we will finally begin tackling them
More background is here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/policy-decisions
Meta-policies
To summarize and/or hopefully avoid useless fluffy discussions:
* Topics will be introduced by Graham. He will put an agenda
for the next month (or so) on
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/
* We will only seriously discuss topics when we have adequate
background research.
* Emails about policy questions will begin with GOP-PROP: in
the subject line. Adjust your email filters accordingly,
depending on whether you are interested or not in such
discussions.
* For each policy question, there will be at least one week
for free-ranging discussion. At that point, Graham will
summarize the discussion and announce a "probable decision".
* We will then have one more week to let people point out
flaws in the summary, make additional arguments, etc.
* There should be no surprises, no time pressure, etc. If you
are particularly concerned about a decision but lack
time/energy to join the discussion, just say so and we will
postponed the decision. I want to have clear, final,
unambiguous decisions; if that takes a long time, so be it.
Agenda
(bad copy&paste job deleted; look at the webpage, or wait for
emails to come)
Cheers,
- Graham
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- GOP-PROP 0: meta-discussion about the discussions,
Graham Percival <=