Re: Circular dependencies for beam-skip.ly

[Neil Puttock]

On 13 July 2011 11:22, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:

> You're right - they would have been the same.  I think this error may have 
> been introduced in a recent patch, in which case it is a regression.  I'd 
> have to run git-bisect to figure it out, though, but all of my CPU is being 
> eaten up by audio rendering at the moment (and just months ago I was bragging 
> about my fast computer...serves me right...).

The cyclic redundancies were present with the initial commit which
added beam-skip.ly.

As I noted on issue 1706, this regression test shows up every time I
do make check (it's become one of those annoying snippets which
switches behaviour between baseline and test).

Cheers,
Neil