Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?

[David Kastrup]

Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > I haven't seen any interest in
>> >   http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
>> 
>> My take on this (if nobody is going to protest in the next few hours) is
>> to revert the flawed fix.
>
> I think that's entirely reasonable.  IMO, if there's no clear
> offer of a fix within 48 hours of a bad commit, we should revert
> it.

Within 48 hours of pinpointing the bad commit.

-- 
David Kastrup