[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.15.8 Regtests
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: 2.15.8 Regtests |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Aug 2011 23:48:30 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Looks like we associate differing meanings with one or several of the
> words "unless", "somebody" or "objects".
>
Oops. I'm delaying pushing.
The troublesome word was the verb "keep", from "I'd like to keep".
Of course you can keep it, on your branch.
If the test remains in input/regression, then anyone inspecting the tests
will think that \revert of nested properties worked completely in version
2.14 but now fails.
Does anyone object to removing the test 'nested-property-revert.ly'
from the input/regression?
- 2.15.8 Regtests, Phil Holmes, 2011/08/06
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests, David Kastrup, 2011/08/06
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests, Keith OHara, 2011/08/06
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests, David Kastrup, 2011/08/06
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests, Keith OHara, 2011/08/06
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests, David Kastrup, 2011/08/06
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests,
Keith OHara <=
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests, Graham Percival, 2011/08/07