[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NR 5.5.4 - Modifying ties and slurs
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
RE: NR 5.5.4 - Modifying ties and slurs |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Aug 2011 21:24:04 +0000 |
Hello,
________________________________________
From: Neil Puttock address@hidden
Sent: 07 August 2011 22:13
To: James Lowe
Cc: Lily-Devel List
Subject: Re: NR 5.5.4 - Modifying ties and slurs
On 7 August 2011 21:58, James Lowe <address@hidden> wrote:
> I guess that opens a whole new vista of questions - i.e. along the lines of
> how would I know that if its not documented in the IR
How is it not documented?
If I navigate to TieColumn,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/internals/tiecolumn
there's a list of interfaces at the bottom, one of which is
tie-column-interface. If I follow this link, there's a description of
tie-configuration:
---
Right. So why do I need to care about TieColumn? Why not just get straight to
desert and link to tie-column-interface - it's back-referenced anyway back to
TieColumn?
> Is what I put instead, factually incorrect and needs 'reverting'?
Well, we usually talk about properties belonging to a grob, so for
consistency, it would be preferable to keep the original (particularly
as the snippet in the LSR also has the same documentation).
---
Well I'm not sure we are that consistent. Also TieColumn is second in line (to
the engraver) of the whole chain of internals and the interface is third. So I
don't see the logic of linking to the Grob if the property you need to change
belongs to one, of often (too) many interfaces below it.
James