[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue4860043)
From: |
n . puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue4860043) |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:22:02 +0000 |
LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860043/diff/11001/lily/beam.cc
File lily/beam.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860043/diff/11001/lily/beam.cc#newcode1736
lily/beam.cc:1736: Below, the prev_offset parameter is intentionally
unused. This is
comment it out then :)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860043/diff/11001/lily/beam.cc#newcode1737
lily/beam.cc:1737: because the old offset is assummedly irrelevant once
the rest
assumedly
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860043/diff/11001/lily/beam.cc#newcode1743
lily/beam.cc:1743: Beam::pure_rest_collision_callback (SCM smob, SCM
prev_offset,
SCM /* prev_offset */,
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860043/
- Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue4860043), mtsolo, 2011/08/10
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue4860043), reinhold . kainhofer, 2011/08/10
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue4860043), n . puttock, 2011/08/10
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue4860043), mtsolo, 2011/08/10
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue4860043), n . puttock, 2011/08/10
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue4860043), pkx166h, 2011/08/10
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue4860043),
n . puttock <=