[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:49:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Another thought. We've established a standard (that not everyone adopts,
> but it's still a standard) that the git repository is locally stored in
> lilypond-git with the build being done in lilypond-git/build. Where would
> these new repositories be locally stored?
Wherever they want. We currently have an average of 3 commits per
*year* to those branches (and the things they would replace). If
they were easier to find, it might go up to 10 commits per year,
but I really doubt that it'd go higher.
The only kind of person who's interested in those other
repositories will have their own favorite directory layout anyway
(like me; all my source repositories go under $HOME/src/) so
they'd ignore any recommendation anyway.
Cheers,
- Graham
- GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Graham Percival, 2011/09/05
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/05
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Trevor Daniels, 2011/09/06
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories,
Graham Percival <=
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Graham Percival, 2011/09/06
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Graham Percival, 2011/09/06
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Wols Lists, 2011/09/07
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Carl Sorensen, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Trevor Daniels, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/09/06