[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:01:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-11-generic; KDE/4.7.0; i686; ; ) |
Am Thursday, 15. September 2011, 14:47:30 schrieb Ian Hulin:
> On 15/09/11 09:19, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > I'd rather interpret no action as tacit approval. As your
> > electronics colleague once said, "Just do it." :)
> >
> > Trevor
>
> 1+
+1
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, (continued)
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Neil Puttock, 2011/09/15
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Graham Percival, 2011/09/15
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, David Kastrup, 2011/09/15
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2011/09/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Graham Percival, 2011/09/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2011/09/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Graham Percival, 2011/09/22
Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Trevor Daniels, 2011/09/15
GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Graham Percival, 2011/09/21