Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems

[address@hidden]

On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:41 AM, Keith OHara wrote:

> mike <at> apollinemike.com <mike <at> apollinemike.com> writes:
> 
>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:38 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
>> 
>>> Phil Holmes <email <at> philholmes.net> writes:
>>>> 
>>>> There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12.  The first is 
>>>> shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes missing. 
>>>> 
>>> Confirming.  The missing fingering indication is hidden under a note head
>>> in the other voice.  The change from Stem to Flag for 2.15.12 is necessary
>>> to see the problem. I'll try to reduce to a minimal example but it will 
>>> take a while; there are lots of interacting overrides in that torture-test.
>>> 
>> 
>> I just compiled the file and I see the fingering indications just fine - I 
> don't think any of the indications
>> are hidden under noteheads (I could be reading the regtest file wrong, 
> however).
> 
> This is as far as I got toward a tiny example:
> 
> \paper {ragged-right = ##t }
> \relative f {
>   \key a \major
>   s1 \break
>   \stemUp
>   r8 a'''8^( gis fis
>   gis fis e)-1-4-5 r
> }
> 

This compiles fine on current master (unoptimized build).

Cheers,
MS