|
From: | David Kastrup |
Subject: | define-void-function or define-procedure ? |
Date: | Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:22:09 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
What would people prefer for creating a Lilypond function that returns an "unspecified" value (what the Guile read-eval-print loop takes as a hint to print nothing at all) and is called for its side effect? define-void-function or define-procedure? The first is a bit more C-ish, the second more Pascal-ish. I am not going to consider define-subroutine though. -- David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |