[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: define-void-function or define-procedure ?

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: define-void-function or define-procedure ?
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:31:25 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:14:26PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> An afterthought, however: we do have an inordinate amount of user-level
> commands that need to be called from Scheme rather than with Lilypond
> syntax.  That does not make sense.  Void music functions have been
> around for eternities, just a bit inconvenient to define, but reasonably
> documented.
> Maybe we need a user interface meister that tries to maintain a bit of
> coherency and sanity when new features get added.

I've been looking for one since mid-2008.  Don't hold your breath.
I think the best chance for this is GLISS.

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]