[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pushing patches to staging
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Pushing patches to staging |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Nov 2011 04:15:24 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805 |
On 11/12/11 9:06 PM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>If you use git am on a patch (or patch series) created with git
>format-patch, it will do the equivalent of cherry-picks instead of just
>duplicating the effect on the work tree. Better for the history than
>just patching. Worse than fast-forwarding. Our typical tool, Rietveld,
>does not use git format-patch.
>
>For work you have done yourself, there is no point juggling with
>patches.
I agree.
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, (continued)
Re: Pushing patches to staging, Peekay Ex, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, Graham Percival, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, Carl Sorensen, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, Carl Sorensen, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging,
Carl Sorensen <=
Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/12
Re: Pushing patches to staging, Phil Holmes, 2011/11/13
Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/13
Re: Pushing patches to staging, Carl Sorensen, 2011/11/13
Re: Pushing patches to staging, Phil Holmes, 2011/11/15
Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/15
Re: Pushing patches to staging, Phil Holmes, 2011/11/15
Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/15
Re: Pushing patches to staging, Phil Holmes, 2011/11/18
Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/18