[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Weird behavior of input/regression/beam-quanting-overhang.png
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Weird behavior of input/regression/beam-quanting-overhang.png |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:16:34 +0100 |
On Nov 17, 2011, at 5:46 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Keith OHara <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Keith OHara <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> writes:
>>
>>> Several of Mike's new regression tests suffer from issue 1723
>>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1723
>>>
>>> We can apply the workaround for issue 1723 to these regression tests.
>>
>> Added stemlets to work around the intermittency, and pushed to
>> staging.
>
> Sorry, but that's totally wrong. We need to address this issue, not try
> hiding it. I have seen no attempt to address it. There has been no
> discussion that has sanctified such a mad course of action, not on the
> list as far as I can see, and not on the issue itself, and no proposed
> Rietveld patch and review for such a controversial course of action. I
> have deleted this from staging and hope it has not yet entered the
> queue.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
Ditto - I'll be able to be on it during a flight if I can't sleep or on Tuesday
afternoon if I can.
Cheers,
MS