[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Duplicate index entries in NR

From: James
Subject: Re: Duplicate index entries in NR
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 10:28:39 +0000


On Sunday, 20 November 2011, Trevor Daniels <address@hidden> wrote:

>> If you look at accent, the two entries there are shown against a single index entry, with 2 pages in the list of references.  I believe that's how the acciaccatura should appear as well - otherwise there's a tendency to miss the fact that there are two entries and only follow the one, missing important information.
> The @index and @funindex macros generate calls to
> different texinfo macros.  From memory the @index
> macro calls @kindex and @funindex calls both
> @kindex and @findex.  The two types of index entries
> are printed with different typefaces, so maybe this
> is why they are kept separate in the pdf.
> Actually the indices in the html manuals are in a far
> worse state.  Entries are not only unmerged but
> every @seealso generates a spurious unhelpful entry.
> See, for example, ambitus.  Indexing has been discussed
> several types in the past (search devel for index
> funindex for a selection), but always deferred until
> (a) the manuals were in a better shape and (b) the
> syntax had stabilised.  Maybe one day ...

is part of this




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]