Re: lilydev 2.0

[James]

hello

On 10 Dec 2011, at 01:38, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:35:36AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> I could probably do it again. Maybe Debian would be better base so it
>> wouldn't need upgrading as much?
> 
> This upgrade is to match our changing development requirements,
> i.e. fontforge 20110222 --enable-double, astyle 2.02, having the
> user profile set up with $LILYPOND_GIT, etc.  Not because of any
> problems in ubuntu 10.04 itself.
> 
> oh wait, were you referring to Ubuntu's frequent security updates?
> Well, I suppose that Debian probably has fewer... but I'd rather
> stay with ubuntu.  All our windows contributors are accustomed to
> it by now, and there's plenty of newbie-oriented help online for
> ubuntu.
> 

and if you need someone to test it let me know. I've been using nothing else 
but lilydev and virtual box to compile and patch LP these last couple of years. 



James