Re: Output from woodwind-diagrams-key-lists.ly

[address@hidden]

On Dec 17, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:

> 
> 
> On Dec 17, 2011, at 8:51 AM, "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Some of the output from make doc comes deliberately from regression tests. 
>> For example, woodwind-diagrams-key-lists.ly puts lots of information similar 
>> to the following on the terminal screen:
>> 
>> Printing keys in verbose mode for: piccolocc   possibilities for one: (one 
>> oneT oneRT oneTR oneR oneRT1q one1qTR oneRT1h one1hTR oneRT3q one3qTR oneRTF 
>> oneFTR one1qT oneT1q one1q one1qT1h one1hT1q one1qT3q one3qT1q one1qTF 
>> oneFT1q one1hT oneT1h one1h one1hT3q one3qT1h one1hTF oneFT1h one3qT oneT3q 
>> one3q one3qTF oneFT3q oneFT oneF)
>> 
> 
>> 
>> Thoughts, please?
> 
> 
> In this case, the regtest is really more documentation than regtest. I think 
> that simplifying and reducing the regtest is the right thing to do. 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Carl
> 

This regtest makes sure that the key-name function works for all instruments - 
I'd be open to other options that do the same thing w/o printing all of this 
stuff.

Cheers,
MS