lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Labelling of patches


From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: Labelling of patches
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:31:39 -0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 06:21:45PM +0000, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 12/17/11 10:31 AM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:
> >Dunno about Phil, but I'd define it as "an issue which has no Tiny
> >example".
> 
> How about doc revisions?  They have no tiny example.  Do we want to make
> sure the changes have made it to the binary distribution, or is it
> sufficient to say they have been pushed to master?

I'd argue that the explanation of the change is a Tiny example, or
at least close enough for this purpose.

> To me, the type should be something like "No visible output" or "Verify
> commit only", instead of "Patch"

Sounds ok to me.

Cheers,
- Graham



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]