[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make fails for staging branch
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: make fails for staging branch |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:20:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:28:44PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Skimming through lily/GNUmakefile, this makes sense. There's a
>> > couple of explicit dependencies for parser.hh, but these don't
>> > mention lily-lexer-scheme.cc, which is the file that triggers the
>> > fail.
>>
>> But the out/lily-lexer-scheme.dep file mentions it in the last line:
>> ../flower/include/arithmetic-operator.hh include/pitch.hh out/parser.hh
>>
>> Does that mean that we generate the dependencies without actually using
>> them? That sounds rather stupid, but then I don't understand the build
>> system anyhow.
>
> ... yes? no?
> Bottom line: somebody added explicit dependencies to
> lily/GNUmakefile, for some reason. It could have been somebody
> not really understanding the build system, but at least it worked.
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if Julien sent in a patch in a few
> hours/days that removed the explicit dependencies for the parser
> in favor of a more general solution. :)
He'll have to be pretty fast. I'm on it. But I am afraid you have to
expect another hour or so before I get this fixed.
--
David Kastrup
- make fails for staging branch, James, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Francisco Vila, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22