[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make fails for staging branch
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: make fails for staging branch |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Dec 2011 02:05:22 +0100 |
2011/12/23 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> Anybody have ideas? At first glance it seems like somebody used a
>> relative directory instead of doing it with $(top-src-dir).
>
> No idea. But the symptom would suggest that
>
> commit 77cfd9e80a9792737a8630ba3c3ecfb359950f9d
> Author: Francisco Vila <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed Dec 21 22:54:53 2011 +0100
>
> Web: remove web/ in some pathnames.
>
> could be a likely candidate for backing out and retesting. The other
> recent changes seem less probable.
Not unless you really think that changes in @verbatim, @example and
quoted strings in CG could make 'make' to break. Or do you?
My info line for the commit is wrong; it should say "CG...", not
"Web...". Initial report came from the web and I fooled both. Sorry
for that.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- Re: make fails for staging branch, (continued)
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/23
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2011/12/23
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2011/12/23
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/23
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/23