Re: how to check clef type?

[Janek Warchoł]

2012/1/8 Marc Hohl <address@hidden>:
> Am 07.01.2012 23:56, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>> I don't have any idea why change clef isn't small.
>
> Are you sure the attached patch is up-to-date with your work?
> I get a small change clef in the fifth line, see attachment.

Strange.  I'm sure there's an error on my compilation; i've applied
that patch over 82efa40ed14c81d619624e2589523ddfd6fb7998.

> Sorry - can't help on that. But generally, wouldn't it be better to store
> the
> offsets in an alist, so that each (glyph . direction) pair has an offset
> number?
> You'll have to take clefs.G_change and the likes into account, too, so the
> if-else-constructs will be rather clumsy.

Perhaps you're right.  I'll work on that when i have correct "mechanics".


2012/1/8 Neil Puttock <address@hidden>:
> 2012/1/8 Marc Hohl <address@hidden>:
>
>> Are you sure the attached patch is up-to-date with your work?
>> I get a small change clef in the fifth line, see attachment.
>
> I get the same result as Janek.  I think the problem is that the
> glyph-name callback checks break-status, thus shouldn't be called from
> the engraver (it's too early, then gets cached when accessed later in
> the print callback).

ok, i think i understand what you said (that's a success :) ), but i
don't know what should i use instead of glyph-name callback - a hint
please?

thanks,
Janek