Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

[pkx166h]

On 2012/01/11 06:57:48, dak wrote:
> On 2012/01/11 05:11:39, janek wrote:
> > There are some duplications in the docs now.
> > (LBTM?)

> "The notation manual has not been revised yet."

> Since I am currently doing the convert-ly rules for juggling the
argument order
> and this will, obviously, also affect the manual both with respect to
> autoconversion as well as text sense, I am saving this for later.  Of
course,
> I'll be happy if someone else does the work on the NR, though of
course the
> Scheme function documentation itself should match the code right away.

I've created

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2213 so I'll work on
the NR as I did all the \footnote Doc in the first place.

I am assuming you still have to include your documentation edits in the
patch so that the docs compile?

Otherwise we will have a bit of a disconnect with the code and
documentation until I push my patch. I'll try to get this done asap.

On a 'merging' note, should I take the diff file from this tracker for
the input.itely and use that as my base so that I don't end up with
'unable to apply' patch type messages on myside if I work from the
*itely as it is in master?

http://codereview.appspot.com/5527058/