[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent
From: |
Benkő Pál |
Subject: |
Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:23:47 +0100 |
> I'd like to see regtests in one of these commits that uses two or three
> simple functions in the form \foo c and <\foo c> that show this distinction.
>
> I thought that any music function could look through its argument, see if was
> an event chord or a note event, and act on it accordingly.
but the argument is the same, it's the environment of the function
result that's different.
the point is to not have to write two versions of each function, one
to be used within chords and one outside.
p
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, (continued)
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Keith OHara, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, address@hidden, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, address@hidden, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, address@hidden, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, address@hidden, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/22
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, address@hidden, 2012/01/22
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent,
Benkő Pál <=
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/22
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, address@hidden, 2012/01/22
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/22
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/22
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/22
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/22
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/22
- checking 2240 (was: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent), Graham Percival, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240 (was: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent), address@hidden, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, David Kastrup, 2012/01/22