[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patchy email
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Patchy email |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:50:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
Seems like I really got mixed up with my builds. Turns out that my
changes.tely entry depends on the patch in
<URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2247> so I
pushed that as well as it is reasonably simple and well-contained.
No idea how this could get through testing, but with my setup I probably
took one "this-is-equivalent" shortcut too many to get this made in a
humanly acceptable time frame.
And it does not look like there would have been any
backward-incompatible doc change (though there are some changes that
really are not related to the EventChord stuff but were basically done
on-the-fly) that would require transferring to the translations.
So Patchy should have a good chance of being happy now.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Patchy email, (continued)
- Re: Patchy email, Graham Percival, 2012/01/25
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/01/25
- Re: Patchy email, Graham Percival, 2012/01/25
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/01/25
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/01/25
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/01/25
- Re: Patchy email,
David Kastrup <=
Patchy email, lilypond . patchy . graham, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, Graham Percival, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, James, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, Graham Percival, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, Graham Percival, 2012/01/28
Re: Patchy email, Graham Percival, 2012/01/28