Re: Rietveld patchy: test run

[Graham Percival]

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:08:42PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival"
> <address@hidden>
> >(I recommend running Patchy as a separate user just in case stuff
> >blows up)
> 
> I kind of thought you were suggesting not experimenting with
> patchy-test at this point.  I also didn't want to get in the way of
> David's testing. However, if needed I could do this as well,
> although turnaround times would not be as good from next Monday on.

I've been debating for the past week about sending an email to
-devel saying that somebody should be doing this.  It's
challenging to decide when I should nag people (or "clarify the
situation") or not.

Anyway: I think we need more people running Patchy.  It's not in
perfect shape, but it's a lot easier than the build system was
when you first started working on that.

- Graham