[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LSR on 2.14 or not?

From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: LSR on 2.14 or not?
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:26:14 +0100

----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> To: "Thomas Morley" <address@hidden>; "David Nalesnik" <address@hidden>; "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "lilypond-devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 9:36 AM
Subject: LSR on 2.14 or not?

Sorry to butt in, but I want to confirm stuff.

1) is LSR running 2.14.2 right now?

2) how many files were uncompilable?  I am aware of one file,
which I believe we deleted.  Were there any other problematic

3) can we do a mundane LSR import?  i.e. don't touch anything in
Documentation/snippets/new/; just do an ordinary full LSR import.
If there's nothing suspicious in the diff go ahead and push
directly to staging, but I wouldn't mind seeing a patch on
rietveld just for peace of mind.

** only after ** all the above steps are complete should we
investigate Documentation/snippets/new.

- Graham

It's on my work stack. Today I'm going to update the LSR itself to add the "docs" tag to the files we added manually - these came from snippets/new. I'll also do a local makelsr run and check and push. I'm going to wait until I have time (possibly Thursday evening, but may be the weekend) and get the docs tarball and run makelsr against it. That'll go on Rietveld and I'm likely to run patchy-test against it myself. If that's OK we'll cross-check which files should be deleted from /new, delete them and patch, review and push. Then I think we can confirm that the needed work has been done.

We then need to update the CG, I'll complete a script which prunes headers and versions from snippets, and we should check that we can test that all snippets compile for future upgrades.

How does that sound?

Phil Holmes

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]