Re: LSR on 2.14 or not?

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
To: "Thomas Morley" <address@hidden>; "David Nalesnik" 
<address@hidden>; "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "lilypond-devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 9:36 AM
Subject: LSR on 2.14 or not?


> Sorry to butt in, but I want to confirm stuff.
>
> 1) is LSR running 2.14.2 right now?
>
> 2) how many files were uncompilable?  I am aware of one file,
> which I believe we deleted.  Were there any other problematic
> files?
>
> 3) can we do a mundane LSR import?  i.e. don't touch anything in
> Documentation/snippets/new/; just do an ordinary full LSR import.
> If there's nothing suspicious in the diff go ahead and push
> directly to staging, but I wouldn't mind seeing a patch on
> rietveld just for peace of mind.
>
>
> ** only after ** all the above steps are complete should we
> investigate Documentation/snippets/new.
>
> - Graham

It's on my work stack.  Today I'm going to update the LSR itself to add the 
"docs" tag to the files we added manually - these came from snippets/new. 
I'll also do a local makelsr run and check and push.  I'm going to wait 
until I have time (possibly Thursday evening, but may be the weekend) and 
get the docs tarball and run makelsr against it.  That'll go on Rietveld and 
I'm likely to run patchy-test against it myself.  If that's OK we'll 
cross-check which files should be deleted from /new, delete them and patch, 
review and push.  Then I think we can confirm that the needed work has been 
done.

We then need to update the CG, I'll complete a script which prunes headers 
and versions from snippets, and we should check that we can test that all 
snippets compile for future upgrades.

How does that sound?

--
Phil Holmes