[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Substitute for s1*0

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Substitute for s1*0
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 10:36:59 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 08:58:11AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:57 AM
>> >In fact, isn't <> generally prettier than s1*0?  Should we be using it
>> >in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
>> Definitely prettier, but maybe not so transparent as s1*0.
> +1
> What about defining a
>   null
> or
>   n
> "note name"?  Then we could write
>   c4 n\footnote

What's the duration of
<c n>

What is the duration of

Where is the point in a note name that does not take to the current
duration?  How is that making things simpler?

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]