[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Substitute for s1*0
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Substitute for s1*0 |
Date: |
Sun, 06 May 2012 14:10:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Francisco Vila <address@hidden> writes:
> Is s*0 valid?
No. *0 is part of the duration, not some magical repeat count.
> It would not change default duration of next note.
It should, if it were allowed.
--
David Kastrup
Re: Substitute for s1*0, Trevor Daniels, 2012/05/06
Re: Substitute for s1*0, Pavel Roskin, 2012/05/06
Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/06
Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Trevor Daniels, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Trevor Daniels, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Graham Percival, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Trevor Daniels, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Keith OHara, 2012/05/07