[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Substitute for s1*0
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Substitute for s1*0 |
Date: |
Sun, 06 May 2012 17:49:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 9:34 AM
>
>> Quick: tell me what you would expect without too much thinking (imagine
>> you are a naive user) from the following:
>>
>> \new Staff <<
>> \relative c'' { c4 d e f s1*0-\markup Oops c d e f g1 } \\
>> \relative c' { c4 d e f <>-\markup Wow c d e f g1 }
>>
>> That's not really a competition, is it?
>
> Well, that's a poor example, as neither form is needed when
> there is a string of notes or s's. So this particular issue
> doesn't really arise in practice.
I prefer things not to blow up even for poor examples. s1*0 will change
the current parser duration to something that works quite unexpectedly
for the average user, and it will rarely be the last duration in the
whole file.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, (continued)
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Keith OHara, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/08
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Trevor Daniels, 2012/05/08
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/08
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Trevor Daniels, 2012/05/08
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/08
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Keith OHara, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Nicolas Sceaux, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Pavel Roskin, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, James, 2012/05/08
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Keith OHara, 2012/05/09
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/09
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Francisco Vila, 2012/05/09
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/09
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/11