[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Substitute for s1*0
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Substitute for s1*0 |
Date: |
Mon, 07 May 2012 22:43:46 +0200 (CEST) |
> I don't understand why David's proposition, which is both cheap and
> neat, faced such opposition. I, for one, will be using the new <>
> idiom.
+1. I'm open to syntax improvements, but currently I fail to see one
which fulfils the necessary constraints. As other have suggested:
Let's do this later.
Werner
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, (continued)
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Trevor Daniels, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Keith OHara, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/08
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Trevor Daniels, 2012/05/08
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/08
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Trevor Daniels, 2012/05/08
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/08
- Re: Substitute for s1*0,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Keith OHara, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Nicolas Sceaux, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Pavel Roskin, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, James, 2012/05/08
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Keith OHara, 2012/05/09
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/09