[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: musicxml2ly

From: pls
Subject: Re: musicxml2ly
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:42:09 +0200

It's not a regression. It has never been officially fixed. A while ago I posted 
a bug report and a minimal example:

Here is a solution for the chord symbol bug: I still haven't found the time to tidy 
up the patch. But it works!
Am 16.05.2012 um 10:18 schrieb Colin Hall:

> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>>>>> The good news is that in many cases only a little editing of
>>>>> the .ly file is required to turn a bad conversion into a good
>>>>> one. For example, all lead sheets from Wikifonia that I have
>>>>> tried have the Chords printed below instead of above the
>>>>> staff.
>>>> I remember this had been fixed in one of the previous lilypond
>>>> 2.15.x versions, but with musicxml2ly from Lilypond 2.15.37 I am
>>>> still (again?) having this problem.
>>> Same with 2.15.38
>> I did not see a reaction to this question, so I try again. What
>> happened with this musicxml2ly bug ? First chords were printed below
>> the staff, then I think it was fixed, and now the chords are below
>> the staff again. Regression?
> That must be very frustrating for you. Sorry that I can't help you, as
> I'm not familiar with musicxml2ly. It appears to be central to
> Patrick's project so I would imagine he or his colleagues are working
> hard on this.
> There are a number of issue trackers relating to musicxml2ly but I see
> no issue tracker for this bug, Martin.
> I'd like to at least record the bug. We can create a tracker if you
> supply these details:
> 1. A version of lilypond/musicxml2ly and a specific lead sheet from Wikifonia
>   in MusicXML format that together exhibit the bug.
> 2. A version of lilypond/musicxml2ly from the 2.15.x series which does not 
> exhibit the bug.
> Cheers,
> Colin.
> -- 
> Colin Hall
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]