[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: discrete slurs and ties
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: discrete slurs and ties |
Date: |
Wed, 23 May 2012 11:40:50 +0200 |
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> We should, definitely!
>> There are bad tie and slur shapes in Lily, but this is not due to
>> not having discrete lengths.
>
> Umm, yes. I've meant: Should lilypond do a `better' job than the
> engravers working with those stamps?
I understand.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:31 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Frankly, I don't see the point in simulating well-craftedness by
> artificially introducing minor deficiencies associated with some of the
> better work. We don't make slightly eroded staff lines copying the wear
> and tear on the tools of particularly renowned publishers, either.
+1
@Werner: i could live with an *option* doing this, but i doubt that
people are interested in writing it. And i think we have much, much,
much more important stuff to work on.
cheers,
Janek