[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?
From: |
Colin Hall |
Subject: |
Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant? |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Jun 2012 16:13:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 01:38:31PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Colin Hall"
> >On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:35:06PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> >>
> >>Have you got the regtest comparison working?
> >
> >How can I tell?
>
> Try opening the html files in Firefox and see what you have.
>
What I have in my GUB build looks very similar to this:
http://lilypond.org/test/v2.15.39-1/compare-v2.15.38-1/index.html
The only difference is that the Lilypond website says:
1045 below threshold
2027 unchanged
whereas my GUB output says:
44 below threshold
958 unchanged
I assume that means I'm running some subset of the regression tests.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
- GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Phil Holmes, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Phil Holmes, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?,
Colin Hall <=
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Phil Holmes, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02
- Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Colin Hall, 2012/06/02
Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?, Graham Percival, 2012/06/02