[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?

From: Colin Hall
Subject: Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:32:38 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:33:24PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival"
> <address@hidden>
> To: "Lilypond Dev" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 7:29 PM
> Subject: Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?
> >On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:14:26PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> >>See:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>That's the space I get with my ISP account so bandwidth (cost) might
> >>be an issue. Would be nice if someone could mirror it so somewhere
> >>more robust/cheaper.
> >
> >Ok.  Alternately, you could only put up a few binaries (say,
> >darwin-x86, mingw, linux-x86, and linux-64).  Also, advertizing it
> >on lilypond-user as unofficial binaries will probably get you
> >between 10 and 100 downloads in total.  At 20 megs each, that's an
> >(estimated) maximum of 2 GB bandwidth.  That's probably ok for a
> >residential ISP, but you may want to double-check.
> >
> >If anybody else wants to chime in and offer hosting, of course
> >that would be quite appreciated.
> I'm personally not convinced this is worth doing.  However, if we
> really want to do it, I could host it off,
> or a new domain. I can set Colin or others up with ftp access if
> needed.

I'd appreciate it, Phil. I pay a quid for everything beyond a gig.



Colin Hall

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]