Re: which-page (issue 6352049)

[thomasmorley65]

On 2012/06/29 10:13:42, t.daniels_treda.co.uk wrote:
> Thomas Morley wrote Friday, June 29, 2012 10:32 AM

> > Of course all features (old and new) should be documented.
> > But, AFAICT, non of the possibilities offered in /ly/titling-init.ly
> > (i.e. first-page, last-page, not-first-page, part-last-page) is
> > documented anywhere in LM or NR.
> > Well, they should be documented, but I propose to open a new issue
to do so.

> Eluze already opened an issue for this - 2579 - and I'm
> part-way through a fix to the docs.  I'll upload it for review
> shortly, and I'd appreciate your comments and help.

Will do.

> > I found only one multi-page-file in the regression-tests containing
a
> > feature of titling-init.ly (i.e. `not-first-page'):
> > input/regression/page-breaks.ly
> > But I think this file tests something else.
> > So I'd suggest to open a new issue for that, too.

> Fine - please do.

Regtest added now.

-Harm



http://codereview.appspot.com/6352049/