[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Syntax change proposal:

From: Trevor Daniels
Subject: Re: Syntax change proposal:
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:14:32 +0100

David Kastrup wrote Monday, July 16, 2012 9:18 AM

> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> One really ugly problem is interpreting things like "4.".  Looks like a
>>> duration, but then we have
>>> input/regression/  line-width = 4.\cm
>> I am against making a change like this outwith[1] of GLISS.  It
>> could involve a lot of user pain (and documentation-editing
>> pain!), so I think it's important to at least pretend[2] to have
>> good user consultation beforehand.
> I disagree with "a lot of user pain".
>> As far as the actual proposal goes, I'm generally in favor.

[snip a long convincing argument]

I'm generally in favour too, but I'd be happier if this were deferred
until 2.17.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]